Monday, April 9, 2012

Republicans and social Darwinism



 Survival of the Fittest, or Survival of the Richest?

President Obama recently referred to Rep. Paul Ryan’s budget plan, “Pathway to Prosperity”, as social Darwinism, in the sense that the plan rewards the rich and leaves the poor and middle class to fend for themselves. Republicans reject this idea, saying the president is mischaracterizing the plan.
Howard Gleckman, a former Business Week reporter who is now a resident fellow at the Urban Institute, reviewed TPC’s analysis of Ryan’s plan. The Tax Policy Center is a joint project of the Urban Institute and Brookings Institution. Gleckman says Ryan’s plan “would result in huge benefits for high-income people and very modest – or no – benefits for low income working households.”
Gleckman, March 23: TCP found that in 2015, relative to today’s tax system, those making $1 million or more would enjoy an average tax cut of $265,000 and see their     after tax income increase by 12.5 percent. By contrast, half of those making between $20,000 and $30,000 would get no tax cut at all.
Catherine Poe, a writer for the conservative Washington Times, in an April 4, 2012 article examines Rep. Ryan’s “Pathway to Prosperity” plan and writes, “Here is some of what would be decimated by these draconian cuts:
     *basic research and support for defense, energy, medicine, manufacturing, education, and communications
     *education from Head Start through college, veteran education, health care
     *construction and repair of highways, tunnels, bridges, airports, ports, waterways and infrastructure that states can’t build or repair
     *oversight of safe food and drugs
     *enforcement of environmental standards to protect and restore clean water and air
     *law enforcement from the FBI to ICE to Homeland Security.”
Social Darwinism is the sociological aspect of Darwinism applied to a society; those who are the greatest value to society (making over $1 million) deserve the greatest benefits, and those who are the least value to society ($30,000, poor) deserve the least benefit. In the case of Rep. Ryan’s plan it would mean the middle class and poor deserve no assistance from the government at all.
 I am no rocket scientist, but it appears to me that this plan would be brutal for most Americans, usher in a caste system and take America into its decline.
What do you think? Is Rep. Paul Ryan’s plan social Darwinism, or just draconian?